AKD panel unravels industry’s mysteries
Tuesday, June 15th, 2010
From left are moderator Jill Wolcott (standing, far left), and panelists Chris de Longpre, Karin Skacel Haack, Cecil Miskin, Lisa Shroyer and Kate Lemmers.
During The National NeedleArts Association’s Summer Market in Columbus, OH, this weekend, I had the pleasure of watching five successful industry professionals share their insights during a panel session hosted by the Association of Knitwear Designers (AKD). The session, “Achieving Mutual Goals In The Yarn Industry,” took place Friday evening right before AKD’s Fashion Show.
Moderated by AKD President Jill Wolcott, who is also the creative director of Y2Knit, the panelists included:
- Chris de Longpre, Knitting at KNoon Designs
- Kate Lemmers, Kate Lemmers Designs
- Cecil Miskin, Buffalo Gold
- Lisa Shroyer, Interweave Knits
- Karin Skacel Haack, Skacel Collection
PLANNING
Wolcott got the ball rolling by asking panelists about their planning habits.
“You can’t be successful without planning,” said de Longpre. “Start with a plan, measure how you’re doing, and be flexible. But that piece of planning is the basis of all the decisions I make.”
She added that she bases her designing schedule on the Spring, Summer and Winter TNNA markets, and tries to stay literally 18 months ahead. (This revelation drew audible gasps from the audience in awe and envy, including myself!)
de Longpre also touched on the importance of planning your marketing efforts. Skacel Haack agreed, noting that there are times when about 90% of her work is simply working on plans.
“Planning is part of business. How else do you know when you get to your goal?” quipped Miskin, who had earlier described his career path as “raising buffalo almost 30 years, been in fiber seven minutes,” thanks to his family’s interest in using the buffalo wool.
As a former magazine editor, I sympathized completely with Shroyer’s statement that her magazine deadlines are set in stone, and that solid planning is essential to reaching them. She notes that there’s about nine months from the call for submissions to print.
Lemmers was seated the farthest away from de Longpre, and the visual concept of spanning the spectrum was enhanced further by her admission that she “plans” her day when she opens her email and sees the next thing that’s due. Her teasing about working so she could eat drew knowing laughs from the audience.
PARTNERING
Wolcott next asked the team about what they consider to be good partnerships, and Skacel Haack was the first to report the workable arrangement between her company — a yarn importer — and designers whose patterns incorporate those yarns.
“We supply the yarn, they create the patterns, we sell and they sell,” she explained, noting that often, Skacel gets the inital pattern order, then customers tend to reorder directly from the designer. But no matter, she added: “As long as the pattern is out there, I don’t care. I don’t pay a dime for her to design it. She makes money for every pattern I sell and she sells. We promote it.”
de Longpre, who has also designed for a variety of manufacturers, advises simply to “work as a team, and everyone is a success.”
Miskin agreed, citing multiple arrangements with designers for his company’s various yarns. “You have to understand there has to be give; everyone gives and everyone gets. Everyone has a need. Be honest with that need — with yourself as well as others.”
“Don’t undercut price,” Skacel Haack said, “and know how to negotiate.”
Shroyer noted that the magazine is provided with free yarn with which to knit the samples. She was asked whether price points are taken into consideration, and replied, “We do the best we can. The editors choose the yarns.”
Lemmers provided another view, admitting that although she was a “yarn snob,” she works within the constraints of the fiber types and palate with which she’s been assigned. That’s when having a good relationship with the manufacturer can really work to her advantage: “Then I know I can say, ‘I’d like to use this (instead).’”
CONSUMERS
Wolcott asked the panel whether they thought there was a stronger voice from the consumer as to input on which designs work — and which don’t.
“Not stronger, but more immediate,” said de Longpre. “It used to be six months before you knew a pattern was a dud. Now, we can measure (feedback) on Ravelry. It gives us access to consumer opinion we didn’t have before.”
The discussion turned to the thorny issue of free downloads. While it can dilute the value of paid patterns, it’s often what consumers are looking for. Skacel Haack admitted to a recent search for a simple afghan square freebie, but de Longpre saw the silver lining: Measuring trends by the popularity of certain patterns.
“If everyone’s searching for free patterns on baby blankets, you might think ‘ooh, how can I get in on it?’” she pointed out. “But just remember, free patterns do need to be supported, so there’s more work that you’re not getting paid for.”
Shroyer believes free patterns can appeal to a wider audience. If your free pattern is of decent quality, they might return for your other patterns. “There’s definitely room for it,” she said.
Miskin reported that Buffalo Gold is selective about its patterns, but those that are chosen are given free of charge to its retailers. “They can resell them or give them away, but we need those patterns to sell yarn,” he added. “Remember, Bill Gates gave away the software (to sell his computers).”
STANDARDIZATION
When Wolcott initially asked the panel about standardization, I believe she was looking at how to download online and that sort of thing. Her panel, however, decided to get into sizing issues — and Wolcott was happy to oblige.
de Longpre wanted to see more plus size patterns, using bust size as the standard.
Shroyer responded that while that was “nice in theory, in practice it never works.” Lemmers noted this was especially true depending on the fit of the design — a tank top vs. a flowing skirt, for example.
“Heck, if the garment industry can’t get it right, how we can expect to?” Skacel Haack chimed in, noting that while her husband is a 34×34 regardless of brand, the measurements of a woman’s size 6, for example, can vary widely.
Shroyer agreed, however, that keeping up pressure for additional size availability for patterns can only be a good thing.
Lemmers asked about a standardized charting system for each magazine, to which Shroyer noted that the Craft Yarn Council of America recently hammered this out, although not every magazine has implemented it. (In case you’re not familiar with it already, check it out at YarnStandards.com. As Wolcott noted, “sizing is there, too… at least it’s a good place to start!”)
Q&A SESSION
The informal question-and-answer period was lively, with panelists and audience alike agreeing that it would be great if knitters used swatches to determine gauge when adapting a pattern. There was discussion about using a “virtual pattern book” to download on demand, and thus free up shop real estate currently housing leaflets and books to instead showcase more yarn. Another audience member lamented the minimum order of patterns — ordering 12, selling three and eating the cost when the yarn it was meant to complement is discontinued.
The conversation then turned to how the panelists felt about anyone posting a pattern for free download or sale and joining the ranks of “professional” designer. Shroyer had a particularly interesting take on the subject:
“You’d think as publishers we’d disagree. But we like both (independent designers and those collaborating with a yarn company),” she said. “If we publish it, we produce it, but we get your URL and your bio published there, too. In our opinion, the more people that are interested in knitting, the better!”
de Longpre agreed with the enough-pie-for-everyone sentiment: “There’s a lot of need out there.”
PARTING SHOTS
Wolcott wrapped up the hour-long event by asking each panelist to sum up his or her advice for the audience:
de Longpre: “Quality control, marketing, teamwork and compromise.”
Skacel Haack: “Teamwork, negotiate, be professional — stick to deadlines! — and planning.”
Miskin: “You can want, or you can do. It’s about planning, negotiating, listening and being open to new things, like standardization.”
Shroyer: “Professionalism goes a long way.”
Lemmers: “Do what you love!”
The AKD plans to have a video of this event posted to its YouTube channel soon, similar to its panel discussion that took place at TNNA’s Winter Market in Long Beach, CA, in January. When they do, I’ll update readers. To view Part I of the January video, however, check out below:



